The administrative structure of public education in the state of Essay

The administrative grammatical construction of existence education in the state of California - Essay Example2) To establish a operable structure, by employing a superintendent, laying down guidelines for hiring other personnel, adopting appropriate policies and curriculum, establishing budget priorities and ensuring provision of facilities. The Board likewise gives direction for formulating and adopting collective bargaining agreements.3) To provide support to the superintendent and staff to carry out their functions by providing good personnel management, making resources useable, upholding rule policies, and liasing between the public and school functionaries.4) To ensure performance/ architectural plan/ financial accountability to the public. . The Board evaluates the superintendent, and sets guidelines for evaluation of other staff, periodically assesses the curriculum and student performance, and also does self-assessments.5) To acts as community leader by meaningfully inv olving the community in educational programs it communicates to them information on district policies/ programs. The Board stands as a link between the student and the community too. (School Board Leadership) Discussion heading (2) Briefly discuss a case or hearing that was presented at your local school display board or in one of the court systems. What was the final decision Give your opinion and/or contend for supporting this decision. I refer to a case of 1981, Segraves v. State of California. (Sacramento Superior Court 278978) Although the case is much than twenty-five years old, the issue is current. It relates to the teaching of scientific evolution in the classroom, and its likely clash with the spectral views of the students, and their right to their views (as enshrined in the US Constitution). Segraves contention was that the discussion of the Theory of Evolution prevented his children and him from the free exercise of their religion. The court, however, base that th e California State Board of Educations Science Framework, as written and as qualified by its anti-dogmatism Policy, gave ample accommodation to the views of Segraves. (Matsumura & Mead, 2001). The Anti-dogmatism Policy insisted that scientific explanations in the class room focus on the how, and not ultimate cause, and that high-risk statements concerning origins, both in texts and in classes, should be presented conditionally, not dogmatically. (Matsumura & Mead, 2001) The court also ruled that all areas of acquisition be covered by this Anti-dogmatism Policy. While I agree that science should be taught without dogmatism, it is also needed that dogmatic adherence to religious beliefs do not prevent a child from acquiring scientific knowledge. Therefore, the judgement in this case was right, permitting openness in looking at scientific theories, and the evidence that was available to support them. *PromptNumerous Civil Rights Acts have covered a variety of topics that have influ enced public education unlawful employment practices, denial of benefits, equal rights, equal protection, and equal employment opportunities. Elaborate on a statement that I heard at a governors conference which stated, The Right to Read is a students Civil Right Explain how the above quote may be both a blemish and an asset to