Accident Analysis Essay

In January 25, 1990, Avianca Flight 52, a Boeing 707 left Bogota, Colombia for New York. After to a greater extent than an hour of delay, the plane ran out of fuel and crashed in the t receive of Cove Neck, Long Island, New York, killing 73 people, including 9 work party members and 65 of the 149 passengers, and injuring the rest. Analysis of this accident would show how human error, faulty systems and bad live conditions caused this accident.The flight crew did not officially decl ar that they were running out of fuel until it was already withal late. The accident could have been avoided if the flight crew has clearly stated that they were really in trouble. Language hindrance could have played a part since the crew only asked for priority which in Spanish could pissed that they were in trouble. The crew should have notified their fuel load to Air business Control when they were put on hold for the first time. This simple information could have made the difference.ATC could ha ve suggested earlier an alternate airdrome had they known this information. Instead, the pilots literally went around in circles waiting for further instructions. By the time the flight was change for landing, it only had enough fuel for one last approach. When the plane was on its final approach, it encountered roll shear, a change of backsheesh direction over short distances. ATC only informed the flight crew of wind shear at 1500 feet. The crew had to abort their approach because they would fall short of the runway. The flight was doomed afterward that incident. Even if they were redirected to an alternate airport prior to the approach, they would not have enough fuel to make it to Boston.The uncertainty now is why the flight crew didnt consult their flight dispatch about possible alternate airports which are not as busy as the John F. Kennedy International. The answer whitethornbe the geological fault of the sterile cockpit rule below 10,000 feet. The sterile cockpit rul e below 10,000 feet states that pilots should not talk about things that are not necessary during crucial stages of the flight, which is usually below 10,000 feet. The pilots mind may have wandered off payable to the long delay the Air Traffic Control has given them.In a sense, Air Traffic Control failed to prioritize air traffic in JFK international. Though Avianca flight 52 did not accommodate its fuel load problems earlier, it did say that it wanted priority. In like mentioned earlier, due to language rampart, priority may have been already a distress call. Air Traffic Control confirmed this request only when what kind of priority is a seventy seven minute delay?Obviously, the failure of the flight crew and Air Traffic Control to communicate properly bequeathed to this horrible accident. This accident could have been avoided if the airline had their own operational control dispatch system that could have assisted them when Air Traffic Control has on the face of it ignored t hem. A standardized terminology in fuel related problems also contributed to the planes crash. If there was only a universal term to describe what the flight was actually experiencing, the language barrier between Air Traffic Control and the pilots would have been irrelevant.To sum up, the plane crash was a result of contributing factors, communication problems, probable mental lapse of the pilots, lack of proper terminology, and unfavorable winds. This accident proves that eternal communication is important in air travel and a high level of concentration is inevitable for the job. Pilots should be trained extensively before giving them their licences, including language training that ensures pilots can converse salubrious in English. In this aspect, a standard language for aeronautical terms should be established. Though the wind shear caused further delay, the plane could have made another attempt if only it had not been uncivilized for more than hour.